Avifaunal Diversity of Sant Guru Ghasidas Government Post Graduate College Campus, Kurud, Chhattisgarh, India

 

Hit Narayan Tandan1*, Chitramani Shrimali1, Razia Sultana2

3Sant Guru Ghasidas Govt. P. G. College Kurud, Chhattisgarh, India, 492001.

2Assistant Professor – Zoology, Shri Kuleshwar Mahadev Govt. College Gobara Nawapara, Raipur (C.G.).

*Corresponding Author E-mail: tandanhn79@gmail.com

 

Abstract:

Sant Guru Ghasidas Government Post Graduate College campus is covering an area of 15-acre south-east of Kurud city. Inside the college campus a biodiversity lab has been established which harbors unique diversity of birds due to its lush green flora all-round the year. The study was undertaken during the month of July 2022 to June 2024. A total of 69 bird species from 54 different genera and 15 orders were documented, with the order Passeriformes being the most dominant, comprising 35 species. The resulting checklist encompasses the majority of 68 bird species classified under the least concern (LC) category according to the IUCN conservation status. However, it is worth noting that one particular species, the Alexandrine parakeet (Psittacula eupatrica) was listed as Near Threatened (NT) category. The study serves as an attempt to explore and prepare a comprehensive checklist for their further study.

 

KEYWORDS: Birds, Floral diversity, Faunal diversity, Ecosystem, Biodiversity lab.

 

 

INTRODUCTION:

Birds are one of the conspicuous fauna in any ecosystem highlighting the health of an ecosystem1, 2. Birds belong to vertebrates having adapted for flight3, 4, 5. They are the only animals with feathers of vibrant and diverse coloration [6, 7]. Their different plumage colors and audio calls enhance the scenic beauty of the nature. Of the more than 9,000 bird species found worldwide, around 1,300 are native to the Indian subcontinent, representing over 13% of the global avian diversity1, 8, 9, 10. These birds play crucial roles as scavengers, pollinators, and predators, contributing to the ecological balance of their environments11, 12, 13, 14.

 

Birds are frequently found in ecosystems and are often regarded as indicator species for the areas they inhabit. [15]. Educational campuses serve as hotspots for urban biodiversity, as they are typically free from development activities and pollution16, 17, 18, 19, 20. Despite covering less than 5% of the total urban area, educational grounds can support up to half of the urban biodiversity, thanks to their relatively undisturbed natural vegetation21.

 

The campus spans approximately 15 acre inhabiting rich flora and fauna. The campus has large ground with grasses, small water-bodies and also covered with large trees, naturally grown shrubs and bushy vegetation providing suitable habitat to them. The campus is also endowed with a botanical garden having different types of fruiting and flowering plant.  The campus boundary is partially surrounded by human colonies and partially by paddy fields. The reason behind the rich avifaunal diversity of the college campus is establishment of biodiversity lab in natural landscape within its premises which covers lush green vegetation and large grasses round the year. Spreading in an area of about 3 acres, the biodiversity lab contributes significant part of campus biodiversity.

Short-term biodiversity assessments are becoming increasingly common, with significant emphasis placed on creating comprehensive bird checklists on a broader scale22, 23. Knowingly the importance of the avifauna and its role in maintaining ecological balance, the present study is mainly focused on to prepare a checklist of the avian diversity of college campus and also concern to raise awareness and conservation.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

The college campus covers a 15-acre area situated southeast of Kurud city(coordinates Latitude 20.82728 and Longitude 81.713037) with an average altitude of 305 m above mean sea level. On the college campus, the 3-acre small wetland behind Science buildings I, II, and III provides a suitable habitat for birds, butterflies, and other wildlife (Figure.1). The study was conducted using random survey with direct observation approaches in all seasons inside the college campus. Photographs were taken by camera (Nikon COOLPIX P1000). Standard literature on Indian birds24 and A Pictorial Guide to the Birds of the Indian sub-continent25 were used for the identification of birds. At the time of preparation of checklist, their IUCN status and feeding habit were also noted.

 

Figure -1. Study area: Campus of  Sant Guru Ghasidas Govt. P.G. College Kurud.

 

RESULT:

This study identified a total of 69 bird species, representing 54 genera and 15 different orders. The order Passeriformes represented by 35 species contribute to dominate the avifauna diversity within the campus. Families such as Accipitridae, Columbidae, and Corvidae were well-represented, reflecting the variety of ecological niches within the campus. The results show a majority of species identified as Least Concern (LC) by the IUCN, indicating reasonably stable populations. However, the Alexandrine Parakeet is classified as Near Threatened (NT), necessitating conservation efforts. There was a notable presence of carnivorous (CV), insectivorous (I), and omnivorous (OM) species, indicating diverse feeding strategies. CV and I diets are widespread, reflecting many species' ecological responsibilities as predators and pest controllers. OM birds, such as the House Crow and Common Myna, show versatility in their dietary habits, which may help explain their extensive distribution. This is the first record of avifaunal diversity at Sant Guru Ghasidas Government PG College, Kurud, Chhattisgarh.

A total of 75 bird species, with a significant diversity of insectivorous and omnivorous birds, and comparable findings with a prevalence of LC species, but a larger total number of species than this study recorded at the University Campus in Kathmandu, Nepal26. 61 bird species documented on a Brazilian university campus27, indicating a considerable presence of frugivorous birds, which were less common in our survey, as well as certain NT species, which aligned to our findings of the Alexandrine Parakeet.

 

The persistent presence of LC species and the diversity of diets on different campuses highlight the relevance of educational institutions as regions of greatest biodiversity.  However, the presence of NT species such as the Alexandrine Parakeet need focused conservation measures to protect these populations. Furthermore, comparisons with other studies show that habitat diversity, availability of water sources, and degrees of human activity all have a major impact on avifaunal diversity. Campuses with water features support a greater number of water-dependent species, whereas those with different vegetation types support a wider range of insectivorous and omnivorous birds.

 

Figure 1: Distribution of birds in different orders with respect to Family, Genus and Species

 

Image-1: Common Hoopoe- Upupa epops

Image-2: Red-Wattled Lapwing - Vanellus indicus

Image-3: Laughing Dove Spilopelia senegalensis

 

Image-4: Spotted Dove Streptopelia chinensis

Image-5: White-throated Kingfisher - Halcyon smyrnensis

Image-6: Indian Roller-Coracias benghalensis

Image-7: Waterhen- Amaurornis phoenicurus

Image-8: Ashy -Crowned Sparrow-lark Eremopterix grisea

Image-9: Indian Silverbill - Euodice malabarica

Image-10:  Red Munia - Amandava amandava

Image-11: Indian RobinSaxicoloides fulicatus

Image-12: Baya Weaver - Ploceus philippinus

Image-13: Asian Pied Starling - Gracupica contra

 

Image-14: Indian Pond Heron - Ardeola grayii

Image-15: Coppersmith Barbet - Megalaima haemacephala

Image-16: Alexandrine Parakeet - Psittacula eupatrica

 

Table 1: List of Birds at Sant Guru Ghasidas Government PG College Campus, Kurud, Chhattisgarh observed during 2022 – 2024

S.N.

Common name

Scientific name

IUCN Cons. Status

Food Habit

Order: Accipitriformes

 

 

Family: Accipitridae

 

 

1.

Shikra

Accipiter badius Gmelin, 1788

LC

CV

2.

Eurasian-Sparrow hawk

Accipiter nisus (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

3.

Black-Shouldered Kite

Elanua caeruleus (Desfontaines, 1789)

LC

 

CV

4.

Black Kite

Milvus migrans (Boaddaert, 1783)

LC

CV

Order: Apodiformes

 

 

Family: Apodidae

 

 

5.

Wire-Tailed Swallow

Hirundo smithii Leach,1818

LC

I

Order: Bucerotiformes

 

 

Family: Bucerotidae

 

 

6.

Indian Grey Hornbill

Ocyceros birostris (Scopoli, 1786)

LC

OM

Family: Upupidae

 

 

7.

Common Hoopoe

Upupa epops (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

I

Order: Charadriiformes

 

 

Family: Charadriidae

 

 

8.

Red-Wattled Lapwing

Vanellus indicus (Boddaert, 1783)

LC

I

9.

Yellow -Wattled Lapwing

Vanellus malabaricus (Boddaert, 1783)

LC

I

Order: Ciconiiformes

 

 

Family: Ciconiidae

 

 

10.

Asian Openbill Stork

Anostomus oscitans (Boddaert, 1783)

LC

CV

Order: Columbiformes

 

 

Family: Columbidae

 

 

11.

Blue Rock Pigeon

Columba livia (Gmelin, 1789)

LC

G

12.

Laughing Dove

Spilopelia senegalensis (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

G

13.

Spotted Dove

Streptopelia chinensis (Scopoli, 1768)

LC

G

14.

Eurasian Collared Dove

Streptopelia decaocta

(Frivaldszky, 1838)

LC

G

Order: Coraciiformes

 

 

Family: Alcedinidae

 

 

15.

Common Kingfisher

Alcedo athis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

Family: Cerylidae

 

 

16.

Pied Kingfisher

Ceryle rudis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

Family: Halcyonidae

 

 

17.

White-throated Kingfisher

Halcyon smyrnensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

Family: Coraciidae

 

 

18.

Indian Roller

Coracias benghalensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

I

Family: Meropidae

 

19.

Green Bee-Eater

Merops orientalils (Latham, 1801)

LC

I

Order: Cuculiformes

 

 

Family: Cuculidae

 

 

20.

Greater Coucal

Centropus sinensis (Stephens, 1815)

LC

CV

21.

Asian Koel

Eudynamys scolopaceus

(Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

F

Order: Gruiformes

 

 

Family: Rallidae

 

 

22.

White-breasted Waterhen

Amaurornis phoenicurus (Pennant, 1769)

LC

OM

Order: Passeriformes

 

 

Family: Aegithinae

 

 

23.

Common Iora

Aegithina tiphia (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

I

Family: Alaudidae

 

 

24.

Ashy -Crowned Sparrow-lark

Eremopterix grisea (Scopoli, 1786)

LC

OM

25.

Indian bush lark

Mirafra erythroptera Blyth,1845

LC

OM

Family: Chloropseidae

 

 

26.

Jerdon's Leafbird

Chloropsis jerdoni (Blyth, 1844)

LC

OM

Family: Cisticollidae

 

 

27.

Common Tailorbird

Orthrotomus sutorius (Pennant, 1769)

LC

OM

28.

Plain Prinia

Prinia inornata (Sykes, 1832)

LC

I

29.

Ashy Prinia

Prinia socialis (Sykes, 1832)

LC

I

Family: Corvidae

 

 

30.

House Crow

Corvus splendence (Vieillot, 1817)

LC

OM

31.

Jungle Crow

Corvus macrorhynches (Wagler, 1728)

LC

OM

Family: Dicruridae

 

 

32.

Black Drongo

Dicrurus macrocercus (Vieillot, 1817)

LC

I

Family: Estrildidae

 

 

33.

Indian Silverbill

Euodice malabarica (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

G

34.

Scaly -Breasted Munia

Lonchura punctualata (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

G

35.

Tricolored Munia

Lonchura malacca (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

G

36.

Red Munia

Amandava amandava (Linnaeus,1758)

LC

G

Family: Laniidae

 

 

37.

Bay-Backed Shrike

Lanius vittatus (Valenciemmes, 1826)

LC

CV

38.

Brown Shrike

Lanius cristatus (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

Family: Leiothrichidae

 

 

39.

Common Babbler

Turdoides caudata (Dumont, 1823)

LC

OM

40.

Jungle Babbler

Turdoides striata (Dumont, 1823)

LC

OM

Family: Motacillidae

 

 

41.

Paddy- field Pipit

Anthus rufulus (Vieillot, 1818)

LC

I

42.

White Wagtail

Motacilla alba baicalensis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

 

I

43.

Gray Wagtail

Motacilla cinerea (Tunstall, 1771)

LC

I

Family: Muscicapidae

 

 

44.

Oriental-Magpie Robin

Copsychus saularis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

OM

45.

Indian Robin

Saxicoloides fulicatus (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

I

46.

Pied bush chat

Saxicola caprata (Linnaeus,1766)

LC

I

Family: Nectariniidae

 

 

47.

Purple Rumped Sunbird

Nectarinia zeylonia (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

N

48.

Purple Sunbird

Nectarinia asiatica (Latham, 1790)

LC

N

Family: Oriolidae

 

 

49.

Black Hooded Oriole

Oriolus xanthernus (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

OM

50.

Eurasian Golden Oriole

Oriolus oriolus (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

OM

Family: Passaridae

 

 

51.

House Sparrow

Passer domesticus (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

G

Family: Plocedae

 

 

52.

Baya Weaver

Ploceus philippinus (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

G

Family: Pycnonotidae

 

 

53.

Red-Vented Bulbul

Pycnonotus cafer (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

OM

Family: Sturnidae

 

 

54.

Common Myna

Acridotheres tristris (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

OM

55.

Asian Pied Starling

Gracupica contra (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

OM

56.

Chestnut-Tailed Starling

Sturnus malabaricus (Gemlin, 1758)

LC

 

OM

57.

Brahmini Starling

Sturnus pagodarum (Gmelin, 1789)

LC

OM

Order: Pelecaniformes

 

 

Family: Ardeidae

 

 

58.

Great Egret

Ardea alba Linnaeus, 1758

LC

CV

59.

Intermediate Egret

Ardea intermedia (Wagler, 1827)

LC

CV

60.

Indian Pond Heron

Ardeola grayii (Sykes, 1832)

LC

CV

61.

Cattle Egret

Bubulcus ibis (Linnaeus, 1758)

LC

CV

62.

Little Egret

Egretta garzetta (Linnaeus, 1766)

LC

CV

63.

Yellow Bittern

Ixobrychus sinensis (Gemlin, 1789)

LC

CV

Order: Piciformes

 

 

Family: Megalaimidae

 

 

64.

Coppersmith Barbet

Megalaima haemacephala (Stalius muller, 1776)

LC

F

Order: Psittaciformes

 

 

Family: Psittacidae

 

 

65.

Alexandrine Parakeet

Psittacula eupatrica (Linnaeus 1766)

NT

F

66.

Rose-ringed Parakeet

Psittacula krameri (Scopoli, 1769)

LC

F

Order: Strigiformes

 

 

Family: Strigidae

 

 

67.

Spotted owlet

Athene brama (Temminck, 1821)

LC

CV

68.

Rock Eagle-Owl

Bubo bengalensis (Franklin, 1831)

LC

CV

Order: Suliformes

 

 

Family: Phalacrocoracidae

 

 

69.

Little Cormorant

Phalacrocorax niger (Vieillot, 1817)

LC

CV

Abbreviations: LC- Least Concern, NT- Near Threatened, CV- Carnivore, I- Insectivore, OM- Omnivore, G- Granivore, F- Fruitivore, N- Nectarivore.

               

CONCLUSION:  

Educational campuses serve as crucial habitats for avifaunal diversity, supporting a wide range of bird species. The found parallels and variations in avifaunal diversity when compared to other research underscore the relevance of habitat quality and conservation efforts in preserving and improving biodiversity in these unique ecosystems. The distribution of dietary habits is constant, with insectivorous and omnivorous species being the most prevalent across campuses. This shows that educational campuses provide different microhabitats that support a variety of eating techniques. The study of avifaunal diversity on college campuses can provide information about habitat quality, biodiversity, and conservation requirements. This comparative study emphasizes the diversity and ecological significance of bird species from different orders and families. While most species are not currently at high risk, continued monitoring and conservation efforts are essential especially for those with diminishing populations or specific habitat.

 

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors have no conflicts of interest regarding this investigation.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

Authors are thankful to the Principal of Sant Guru Ghasidas Government PG College, Kurud for their invaluable support and encouragement throughout the course of this study. We are also grateful to the M.Sc. (Zoology) students for their devotion and hard work during fieldwork and data collection.

 

REFERENCES:

1.          Jha, C. S., and Singh, J. S.  Composition and dynamics of dry tropical forest in relation to soil texture. Journal of Vegetation Science. 1990; 1(5): 609-614.

2.          Gopi Sundar, K. S. Are rice paddies suboptimal breeding habitat for Sarus Cranes in Uttar Pradesh, India?. The Condor. 2009; 111(4): 611-623.

3.          Padian, K., and Chiappe, L. M. The origin of birds and their flight. Scientific American. 1998; 278(2): 38-47.

4.          Prum, R. O., and Brush, A. H. The evolutionary origin and diversification of feathers. The Quarterly Review of Biology. 2002; 77(3): 261-295.

5.          Terrill, R. S., and Shultz, A. J. Feather function and the evolution of birds. Biological Reviews. 2023; 98(2): 540-566.

6.          Prum, R. O., and Torres, R. Structural colouration of avian skin: convergent evolution of coherently scattering dermal collagen arrays. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2003; 206(14): 2409-2429.

7.          Shawkey, M. D., and Hill, G. E. Carotenoids need structural colours to shine. Biology Letters. 2005; 1(2): 121-124.

8.          Grimmett, R., Inskipp, C., and Inskipp, T.  Field Guide to Birds of the Indian Subcontinent: India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh and the Maldives. Bloomsbury Publishing. 2019

9.          Ali, S. The book of Indian birds.  1996

10.        Sangode, V., Chavhan, P., Meshram, H., and Roy, P. Avifaunal diversity of Durg, Chhattisgarh state. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies. 2015; 3: 166-168.

11.        Wenny, D. G., Devault, T. L., Johnson, M. D., Kelly, D., Sekercioglu, C. H., Tomback, D. F., and Whelan, C. J. The need to quantify ecosystem services provided by birds. The Auk. 2011; 128(1): 1-14.

12.        Narendra Prasad, S., and Verma, A. Role of Birds in Indian Agriculture. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2012;  82(10): 847-853.

13.        Mariyappan, M., Rajendran, M., Velu, S., Johnson, A. D., Dinesh, G. K., Solaimuthu, K. and Sankar, M. Ecological role and ecosystem services of birds: a review. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change. 2023; 13(6): 76-87.

14.        Adhurya, S., Gayen, D., Chakrabarty, M., and Singha Roy, U. A study of avian diversity in Durgapur government college campus, West Bengal, India. The holistic Approach to Environment. 2023; 13(2): 48-62.

15.        Blair, R. B. Birds and butterflies along an urban gradient: surrogate taxa for assessing biodiversity. Ecological Applications. 1999;  9(1): 164-170.

16.        Goddard, M. A., Dougill, A. J., and Benton, T. G. Scaling up from gardens: Biodiversity conservation in urban environments. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 2010; 25(2): 90-98.

17.        Aronson, M. F., La Sorte, F. A., Nilon, C. H., Katti, M., Goddard, M. A., Lepczyk, C. A. and Winter, M. A global analysis of the impacts of urbanization on bird and plant diversity reveals key anthropogenic drivers. Proceedings of The Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2014; 281(1780): 20133330.

18.        Tandan, H. N., Maheshwari, R., and Tandan, S. Avifaunal diversity of Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Campus, Raipur (Chhattisgarh). IOSR Journal of Environmental Science, Toxicology and Food Technology. 2015; 1(6): 41-44.

19.        Ul Haq, I., Bhat, B. A., Rehman, S., and Mir, Z. R. Avian species diversity of University of Kashmir Campus, Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir, India. Intl J Adv Sci Res Manag. 2019; 4(2): 75-78.

20.        Guthula, V. B., Shrotriya, S., Nigam, P., Goyal, S. P., Mohan, D., and Habib, B. Biodiversity significance of small habitat patches: More than half of Indian bird species are in academic campuses. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022;  228: 104552.

21.        Jain, N. K., Patel, S. N., and Patel, M. V. Birds of Gujarat University Campus, Ahmedabad. Zoos' Print Journal. 2005; 20(12): 2111-2113.

22.        Chakravarthy AK, Sridhar S. Bird diversity and conservation. Ornithological Society of India. Bangalore. 1995: 19-31

23.        Nerlekar, A. N., Warudkar, A. M., Gowande, G. G., Salve, S. S., Raut, A., Patankarand, S. R., and Nalavade, S. B. A review of the faunal diversity of the Fergusson College campus, Pune, India. Zoo's Print. 2016; 31(10): 4-25.

24.        Ali S and Futehally L. (2008). About Indian Birds, Wisdom Tree, 4779/23 Ansari Road, Darya Ganj, New Delhi- 110002

25.        Ali, S., Ripley, S. D., and Dick, J. H. (1983). A pictorial guide to the birds of the Indian Subcontinent.

26.        Thapa, J. B., and Saund, T. B. Water quality parameters and bird diversity in Jagdishpur Reservoir, Nepal. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology. 2012; 13(1): 143-155.

27.        Fecchio, A., Lima, M. R., Svensson-Coelho, M., Marini, M. A., and Ricklefs, R. E. Structure and organization of an avian haemosporidian assemblage in a Neotropical Savanna in Brazil. Parasitology. 2013; 140(2): 181-192.

 

 

 

Received on 20.08.2024       Modified on 24.08.2024

Accepted on 26.08.2024      ©A&V Publications All right reserved

Research J. Science and Tech. 2024; 16(3):229-236.

DOI: 10.52711/2349-2988.2024.00033